sanjeed5/awesome-cursor-rules-mdc vs VoltAgent/awesome-agent-skills
VoltAgent/awesome-agent-skills scores higher overall: 56/100 (B-tier) against 55/100 (B-tier). sanjeed5/awesome-cursor-rules-mdc leads on reliability, skill leverage, safety; VoltAgent/awesome-agent-skills leads on maintenance, adoption. Scored 2026-07-07, methodology v1.0.
Dimension by dimension
| Dimension | awesome-cursor-rules-mdc | voltagent-awesome-agent-skills |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 48 | 42 |
| Skill Leverage | 60 | 58 |
| Documentation | 72 | 72 |
| Maintenance | 62 | 86 |
| Safety / Governance | 50 | 48 |
| Evaluation Readiness | 30 | 28 |
| Composability | 66 | 62 |
| Adoption (capped) | 58 | 80 |
| Overall | 55 · B | 56 · B |
The entries
A curated collection of Cursor rules in the modern .mdc format, organized by library and framework. The .mdc counterpart to the older…
A 1000+ entry aggregator of agent skills across Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, and Cursor. Wide coverage, minimal curation signal.
Frequently asked questions
sanjeed5/awesome-cursor-rules-mdc or VoltAgent/awesome-agent-skills?
VoltAgent/awesome-agent-skills scores higher overall (56 vs 55, methodology v1.0). But they are the same category, so the dimension table below is the real answer.
How is this comparison generated?
Both scorecards come from the same public rubric with evidence notes, scored by the same editorial process. This page presents them side by side; it adds no new judgments beyond the scores themselves.